Lately, I have been thinking about the greats who weren’t
greats specifically because someone greater existed in their time. This has
happened in every generation, but the 1920s and 1930s were a great example of
the phenomenon, so we’ll use Alekhine as an example.
Because Alekhine existed and was so powerful, many great
players unfortunately lived in his shadow, both then and now. When someone like
Alekhine comes along, it’s very difficult to make a name for yourself.
Here is a list of a few greats who weren’t great because of
Alekhine:
Hans Kmoch
Saviely Tarakover
Aaron Nimzowitsch
Aaron Nimzowitsch
Frederick Yates
Frank Marshall
Rudolf Spielmann
Richard Reti
Geza Maroczy
David Janowsky
Edgar Colle
Fritz Saemisch
Akiba Rubinstein
Ernst Gruenfeld
Hans Mueller
Efim Bogoljubow
Vasja Pirc
Salo Flohr
Henry Grob
Vera Menchik
Reuben Fine
There are a ton more, but I’ll leave it at that so you get
the gist. Now, just about every player on that list was very accomplished and
extremely strong. Many of them had opening variations named after them, which
are still regularly used today, such as Gruenfeld, Reti, and Pirc.
Now, have you ever wondered what the heck would have
happened if the big boys like Euwe, Alekhine and Capablanca were out of the
picture? Some of these ‘big’ chess names would have become giant chess names,
that’s what.
I try and appreciate the games of these lesser masters, but
the draw to Alekhine prowess is simply too great for me. I always end up firing
up the Alekhine database and scrolling through the moves with awe.
Do you have a favorite player who lived in the shadow of a greater player?
I grew up on Nimzowitsch. That's not something one hear's every day. :)
ReplyDeleteNot sure why I spelled 'hears' wrong... must be the wine.
ReplyDelete